I remember watching a lot of Sesame Street as a kid, “This is Kermit the Frog for Sesame Street news.” I also remember him pairing up with the very much empowered Miss Piggy. Boy, they certainly made a wonderful couple back then. I wonder how they are doing now, imagine that, a meaty pig and a rather frail frog. I haven’t been watching the Muppets and Sesame Street for quite some time now.
I wonder if frogs, and their metaphorical counterparts, can only get action onscreen and in fantasy?
The other day, I had a conversation with a friend about frogs and their role in fairy tales. Frogs are possessive SOBs, if you ask me. Like, how many stories are there with the frogs turning into a prince? One, right? I think frogs aren’t portrayed favorably in the rest of the stories. In Thumbelina, the frog even wanted to keep the protagonist for himself, or was it for a fellow frog? I don’t remember. Then again, I don’t remember the rest of the stories with frogs in them.
Nonetheless, let us take up the cause for frogs and why they should be given a fair chance by the possessive/ dominant female:
1. Frogs, well, they’re pretty low maintenance. They eat flies, right?
2. Frogs, they will not complain — even with intense nagging. They basically don’t have ears. Well, even if they did, I am not sure if they would understand what nagging is, either.
3. Frogs, despite the slimy appearance, are quite fragile. If the dominant female finally decides to get rid of him, she can simply crush him to bits.
4. Frogs, although low probability, might actually turn out to be rich and into a prince from all the kissing. So, stay on it, ladies. I mean, if you’re desperate enough.
5. And yeah, you might love the tongue action. =P rrrrribbbbit!